KAROUN must not be fated like the ARAL Sea and the Mesopotamian Marshland

  

Translated by:

Fereshteh Movasaghnejad, Leila Bandari

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Mr. president

As you know the plan for Karoun water transfer for agricultural usages has faced protests. Since this plan license is issued before the approval of the third Development Plan, no environmental assessment is done for this plan with all its consequences and different aspects. Since this plan in the case of implementation would lead to many hazardous results, Earth watchers Center finds it necessary to refer to some points about the environmental hazards of this plan.

UNEP has warned Iranian Department Of Environment (DOE) against catastrophes happening in the Southwest of Iran and Iraq south in the scale of what happened in the Aral Sea and Amazon Forests. For this purpose, it seems useful to refer briefly to these greatest environmental catastrophes.

For centuries, the Amu Darya and Syr Darya Rivers have provided the Aral Sea with constant fresh water enriching its mineral composition and promoting diverse marine life.

Fifty years ago, in an effort to booster Russia’s textile industry, the water from Amu-Darya and Syr-Darya Rivers was transferred to  White Gold” fields, the cotton farms of Uzbekistan and in this way, they increased cotton plants from  3.5 hectares to 7.5 hectares.

The results of these ambitions revealed in the 1980s. The amount of the water flowing into Aral sea decreased to one tenth of 1950 and its area reduced to one third of its natural measure and retreated 100 kms and its salinity increased.

The sea fishing ports of "Muynak" in Uzbekistan and "Aralsk" in Kazakhstan was destroyed and deserted entirely. Fishing industry and over sixty thousands jobs have been lost. Most of the cotton fields have been lost due to environmental change. The irreparable economic costs were not the only consequences of improper decisions of Russian rulers, but more disastrous was the increase of water salinity and depriving five millions of people from potable water. Million tons of contaminated dust is carried each year by wind and deposited on crop land and populated areas. People confront epidemics of lung and respiratory diseases, skin and throat cancers and anemia belonging to the epidemic proportions all brought on by toxic dust. Based on the UNESCO reports, more and more pregnant women fall in hazardous situation, for the unhealthy water. Most babies come to the world, dead or malformed so that this region has the highest rate of baby’s death in the world.

The second case concerns the Mesopotamian Marshland. According to the reports of UNEP, 90% of the largest marshland of the Middle East has changed to a salty desert by human artifacts.  Settled in the end of the Karkheh River on borders of Iran and Iraq, this marshland is fed by Tigris and Euphrates and Karkheh Rivers. In the past 40 years, Iraq and Turkey have built 30 huge dams on the two rivers of Tigris and Euphrates.  The huge projects of water diversion such as Sadam Channel have decreased the marshland area to one-tenth of its natural measure.

There is a water war between Iraq and Turkey. It is not wise to expect Turkey Government to do environmental assessment in building Ataturk Dam with the capacity of 30 BCM water storage. Likely, Sadam Government was unexpected to stop water transfer projects with water capacity of more than two times that of the two rivers. But it can be expected that the Islamic Republic of Iran would transfer water from Karoun and Dez headstreams on the basis of a comprehensive land use planning. Unfortunately, not only this minimum expectation is met, but so far a comprehensive plan for Karoun water Resources and Spending is not prepared yet.

Mesopotamian Marshland (2000)

 

Mesopotamian Marshland (1973)

In our opinion, the major fault of our environmental problems with witch we are now confronted and have led to unpleasant economic and social consequences, falls with lack of land use planning.  Despite the emphasis put on land use planning in the third and fourth development plan, the lack of it has resulted in the prevalence of sectoral approach on planning.  In the context of apparently attractive policies such as “water transfer from waterlogged plains to aquitards”, the situation aggravates.

At present, Energy Ministry issues licenses for water spending on the basis of accumulative volume which is not a reasonable basis at all. It seems as if this ministry does not consider the geological structures of upstream and downstream even in issuing the same licenses. Considering the specifications of arid and semi-arid regions, namely the short period of precipitation and strong fluctuations of dry year and wet year period, as well as the increase of sewage inflow density (including agricultural, industrial, hospital and domestic sewages), we notice that water transfer has deteriorated the critical conditions of Karoun.   

Mr. president! On the basis of principles of environment protection we regard it our duty to demand your Excellency to prevent Karoun water transfer and make Environment Protection Organization prepare the environmental assessment of Karoun Water Transfer in order to reveal what consequences these plans have had for the upstream and downstream lands, and also Energy Ministry be made to prepare the comprehensive plan for Resources and Spending of Karoun Area and make it approved by Water High Council.

.

Sir, at present thirty percent of Khouzestan province is desert, where 700,000 hectares are threatened by wind erosion and sand-dune. Now that the environmental disaster of the great project of Aral water transfer is revealed to all around the world, please don’t let it to be repeated in Iran.

Sincerely yours,

Earth Watchers Center

 

Home